B2B vs B2C Intent Data: 5 Major Differences Every Marketer Should Know

B2B vs B2C intent data is not the same. 

The second they click on an ad, download a whitepaper, put a product into their basket, or do something else of value, their activity says it all. However, not all intent data is equal, especially when comparing B2B and B2C buying behavior.

On the surface level, both types of data allow for identifying interest. Behavioral signals help here to capture these signals. However, the way the interest is displayed and the way you act on that interest are very different, and knowing those differences is not only useful but crucial.

Let’s dive into the five biggest differences every marketer should know.

Here are the five differences between B2B and B2C intent data–

1. Buying Cycle Length and Complexity

B2B purchasing cycles are much more complicated and slower than B2C purchasing cycles, and this is common-sense reasoning to believe, as B2C purchases often happen immediately after a consumer sees an advertisement or receives an email, evaluates options and wades through a vast amount of content, makes a decision, finalizes the purchase, and completes the transaction all typically within a matter of minutes. 

According to Forrester, 86% of B2B purchases experience delays or stalls at some point in the buying process. Often these delays occur due to spending constraints, internal review, multiple layers of approvals, procurement timelines, risk assessments, compliance checks, and needing time to align many stakeholders.

B2C purchases are made by individuals who have their needs and wants, and it is easier to decide with less complexity of decision-making. B2B purchasing is a more multi-threaded buying relationship that takes months to unfold. This means that buyers don’t show intent through one action like downloading content, B2B buyers reverse engineer their intent by engaging in multiple actions and behaviors over weeks, and sometimes, months.

2. Who’s the Actual Buyer?

In a B2C model, the buyer is the end-user, an individual who expresses a need, researches options, and makes the purchase. Their behaviors, like viewing a product, adding it to a cart, or engaging on social media, are typically clear indicators of purchase intent.

B2B is a different ball game. Building consensus to make a purchase decision is rarely a one-person exercise. Even if there is one person who does research, another person evaluates fit, and others are responsible for budget, procurement, or legal review. In B2B individual attributes and priorities are just the starting point. Now we have multiple participants adding their perspectives to the conversation. 

Because of the collaborative nature of B2B, we need to think of account-level, rather than individual-level intent. Signals of buying intent are seen in organizations as a whole when evaluated jointly. Examples include content downloads, demo requests, email engagement, site visits, and the intent to buy seen in organizations. 

The Takeaway: In B2C you are persuading an individual. In B2B you are creating alignment across a group. Your success depends on effectively influencing a group’s decision-making process.

3. Sources of Intent Data

Intent data in B2C is largely sourced from first-party channels. Online stores, loyalty programs, and mobile applications give marketers firsthand information about users’ behavior. Such signals as purchase history, browsing, or app usage often are instantaneously provided and directly traceable to specific customers.

In B2B, signals of intent originate from a larger and more dispersed ecosystem. Marketers use behavioral analysis to learn what prospects are looking for on the internet. This might involve monitoring what a company is reading about, what technologies they’re weighing, or which competitors they’re considering, all before ever visiting a brand site.

The takeaway: B2C intent data is immediately accessible and attached to individual users. B2B intent data may be collected from anywhere in the digital ecosystem, needing to be aggregated and interpreted at the company level.

4. Trigger Signals and Content Consumption

What Sparks Interest In B2C, purchasing intent frequently tracks along habitual patterns based on emotional impulses or promotion-related events like holiday celebrations, seasonal sales, or time-limited offers. These occasions create pressure and propel quick decision-making.

B2B purchasers, though, go through a more deliberate, slower process. Their motivation is initiated by the awareness of a business issue, rather than a price reduction. Consumption behaviors of the content mirror this: whitepapers, case studies, webinars, and calculators that assist in justifying an investment or detailing possible ROI are far more pertinent. The choice process tends to be cumulative as purchasers gather data, compare possibilities, and collaborate with other colleagues throughout the process.

The takeaway: B2C intent is immediate and swift a sprint to buy. B2B intent is a consistent and deliberative marathon of well-researched decision-making.

5. Conversion Pathways

With B2C, the conversion flow tends to be linear and transactional: a user views a product, puts it in the cart, and checks out. The process is brief, and the intent signal most often maps directly to purchase behavior.

Conversion in B2B is less direct and more complicated. One signal, such as downloading a whitepaper or asking for a demo can signal early buying interest, not buying readiness. The ultimate conversion, like signing a contract or producing a purchase order, might come weeks or even months after interaction. Knowing where a buyer sits on their journey is key to correctly interpreting intent.

The takeaway: Conversion is usually the last step in B2C. It’s the starting point in B2B for a more in-depth journey that culminates in pipeline creation and long-term customer acquisition.

Final Thoughts: Why These Differences Matter

Although intent data assist marketers in distinguishing buying interest, it is an expensive error to treat them as the same. To successfully survive in the market you should understand the key points in B2B vs B2C intent data.

Intent source, intent structure, and intent signals differ extensively between the two. B2C is quick, emotion-led, and focused on people. B2B is slow, multifaceted, and encompasses a web of stakeholders.

Embracing these distinctions isn’t merely beneficial, it’s essential. For those trying to tailor outreach, maximize lead generation, and sync up sales efforts, the solution is how intent shows itself differently in B2B.

More significantly, how to respond to those signals appropriately.

FAQs

1. What should marketers do with B2B intent signals? 

Instead of leaping to sell, marketers ought to position content and outreach according to the buyer’s journey phase, incrementally nurturing leads and engaging sales where signals indicate preparation.

2. Can B2C brands leverage intent data as well? 

Yes. B2C brands apply first-party intent data, such as cart activity, loyalty program participation, and browsing history to customize offers and optimize timing.

3. What are typical sources of B2B intent data? 

Sources range from third-party data providers (such as Bombora or G2), behavioral analytics, site engagement, and firmographic targeting tools.

4. How is B2B intent data distinct from B2C intent data? 

B2B intent data tends to be sourced from various stakeholders at a company and analyzed at the account level. B2C intent data is more immediate and related to individual consumer actions.

5. Why is account-level intent relevant in B2B? 

Since B2B purchasing is a multi-person process, intent signals from throughout an organization must be integrated to comprehend the stage and level of interest.

Contact Us for Sales